Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GRNY vs XLK: how they differ

GRNY and XLK hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and XLK returned more over the year.

Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GRNY and XLK hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GRNY and XLK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGRNYXLK
Advanced Micro Devices Inc4.17%5.28%
Broadcom Inc2.94%5.41%
NVIDIA Corp2.46%14.66%
Apple Inc2.40%12.86%
Microsoft Corp2.38%8.38%
KLA Corp2.75%2.20%
Palantir Technologies Inc2.33%1.49%
Arista Networks Inc2.88%0.98%
Cadence Design Systems Inc2.54%0.58%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GRNYOnly in XLK
Quanta Services Inc 3.20%Micron Technology Inc 5.42%
GE Vernova Inc 3.05%Intel Corp 3.68%
Amazon.com Inc 3.02%Applied Materials Inc 3.20%
Strategy Inc 3.01%Lam Research Corp 3.02%
Alphabet Inc 2.96%Cisco Systems Inc 2.59%
Netflix Inc 2.82%Sandisk Corp 1.88%
Caterpillar Inc 2.69%Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.54%
Bank of New York Mellon Corp/T 2.59%Texas Instruments Inc 1.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

GRNY and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
XLK
State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFundstratState Street
What it isFundstrat Granny Shots US Large CapTechnology
Total return, 1 year+13.8%+39.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−3.7 pts+21.7 pts
Expense ratio0.75%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50097.0%100.0%
Holdings4074

GRNY in plain words

GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.

XLK in plain words

XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GRNY or XLK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GRNY returned +13.8% and XLK returned +39.2%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GRNY or XLK?
GRNY charges 0.75% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GRNY and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of GRNY and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GRNY against XLK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GRNY against XLK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GRNY-XLK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources