Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GRNY vs VTV: how they differ

GRNY and VTV hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and VTV returned more over the year.

Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF and Vanguard Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GRNY and VTV hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GRNY and VTV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGRNYVTV
JPMorgan Chase & Co2.33%3.07%
Caterpillar Inc2.69%1.84%
Chevron Corp2.46%1.18%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The2.27%1.07%
Amgen Inc2.15%0.73%
General Electric Co2.04%0.73%
American Express Co2.17%0.69%
Deere & Co2.30%0.61%
Union Pacific Corp2.39%0.61%
Bank of New York Mellon Corp/T2.59%0.37%
PNC Financial Services Group I2.21%0.37%
Northrop Grumman Corp1.92%0.27%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GRNYOnly in VTV
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.17%Micron Technology Inc 4.89%
Quanta Services Inc 3.20%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.96%
GE Vernova Inc 3.05%Johnson & Johnson 2.30%
Amazon.com Inc 3.02%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.13%
Alphabet Inc 2.96%Walmart Inc 1.87%
Broadcom Inc 2.94%AbbVie Inc 1.67%
Arista Networks Inc 2.88%Cisco Systems Inc 1.57%
Netflix Inc 2.82%UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.42%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

GRNY and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
VTV
Vanguard Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFundstratVanguard
What it isFundstrat Granny Shots US Large CapUS value
Total return, 1 year+13.8%+22.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−3.7 pts+5.4 pts
Expense ratio0.75%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50097.0%98.6%
Holdings40308

GRNY in plain words

GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.

VTV in plain words

VTV is an index equity fund tracking the US value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GRNY or VTV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GRNY returned +13.8% and VTV returned +22.9%, so VTV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GRNY or VTV?
GRNY charges 0.75% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GRNY and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of GRNY and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GRNY against VTV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GRNY against VTV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GRNY-VTV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources