Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GRNY vs VOOG: how they differ

GRNY and VOOG hold 32% of their weight in the same names, and VOOG returned more over the year.

Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GRNY and VOOG hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GRNY and VOOG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGRNYVOOG
Amazon.com Inc3.02%3.90%
Alphabet Inc2.96%6.17%
Broadcom Inc2.94%5.90%
NVIDIA Corp2.46%14.29%
Apple Inc2.40%6.38%
Microsoft Corp2.38%9.31%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc4.17%2.34%
Meta Platforms Inc2.24%3.85%
Tesla Inc2.15%2.12%
JPMorgan Chase & Co2.33%1.43%
Caterpillar Inc2.69%1.14%
Netflix Inc2.82%1.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GRNYOnly in VOOG
Strategy Inc 3.01%Alphabet Inc 4.90%
Eaton Corp PLC 2.56%Micron Technology Inc 3.04%
ONEOK Inc 2.49%Eli Lilly & Co 2.44%
Air Products and Chemicals Inc 2.48%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.42%
Chevron Corp 2.46%Lam Research Corp 1.11%
Texas Pacific Land Corp 2.40%Applied Materials Inc 0.99%
Union Pacific Corp 2.39%Johnson & Johnson 0.89%
Costco Wholesale Corp 2.33%Visa Inc 0.84%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

GRNY and VOOG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFundstratVanguard
What it isFundstrat Granny Shots US Large CapS&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year+13.8%+17.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−3.7 pts+0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.75%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50097.0%100.0%
Holdings40146

GRNY in plain words

GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.

VOOG in plain words

VOOG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GRNY or VOOG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GRNY returned +13.8% and VOOG returned +17.8%, so VOOG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GRNY or VOOG?
GRNY charges 0.75% a year and VOOG charges 0.05%, so VOOG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GRNY and VOOG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of GRNY and 100% of VOOG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 32% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GRNY against VOOG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GRNY against VOOG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GRNY-VOOG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources