Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GRNY vs USMV: how they differ

GRNY and USMV hold 11% of their weight in the same names, and GRNY returned more over the year.

Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GRNY and USMV hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GRNY and USMV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGRNYUSMV
NVIDIA Corp2.46%1.64%
Microsoft Corp2.38%1.56%
TJX Cos Inc/The2.33%1.15%
Northrop Grumman Corp1.92%0.85%
Apple Inc2.40%0.82%
Monster Beverage Corp2.17%0.72%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc4.17%0.53%
Arista Networks Inc2.88%0.52%
Broadcom Inc2.94%0.50%
Palantir Technologies Inc2.33%0.50%
Chevron Corp2.46%0.41%
Costco Wholesale Corp2.33%0.32%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GRNYOnly in USMV
Quanta Services Inc 3.20%CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.81%
Strategy Inc 3.01%EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%
Alphabet Inc 2.96%DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 1.55%
KLA Corp 2.75%THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 1.53%
Caterpillar Inc 2.69%AMPHENOL CORPORATION 1.51%
Bank of New York Mellon Corp/T 2.59%Chubb Limited 1.50%
Eaton Corp PLC 2.56%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1.49%
ONEOK Inc 2.49%WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. 1.48%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

GRNY and USMV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFundstratiShares
What it isFundstrat Granny Shots US Large CapMSCI USA Min Vol Factor
Total return, 1 year+13.8%+6.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−3.7 pts−10.9 pts
Expense ratio0.75%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50097.0%94.8%
Holdings40170

GRNY in plain words

GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.

USMV in plain words

USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GRNY or USMV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GRNY returned +13.8% and USMV returned +6.6%, so GRNY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GRNY or USMV?
GRNY charges 0.75% a year and USMV charges 0.15%, so USMV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GRNY and USMV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of GRNY and 95% of USMV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GRNY against USMV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GRNY against USMV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GRNY-USMV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources