Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GRNY vs RSP: how they differ

GRNY and RSP hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and RSP returned more over the year.

Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GRNY and RSP hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GRNY and RSP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGRNYRSP
Advanced Micro Devices Inc4.17%0.33%
Quanta Services Inc3.20%0.25%
GE Vernova Inc3.05%0.25%
Caterpillar Inc2.69%0.24%
Amazon.com Inc3.02%0.24%
Arista Networks Inc2.88%0.24%
Broadcom Inc2.94%0.24%
KLA Corp2.75%0.23%
Bank of New York Mellon Corp/T2.59%0.22%
Cadence Design Systems Inc2.54%0.22%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The2.27%0.22%
JPMorgan Chase & Co2.33%0.21%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GRNYOnly in RSP
Strategy Inc 3.01%Intel Corp. 0.38%
Eaton Corp PLC 2.56%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.34%
ON Semiconductor Corp. 0.33%
Sandisk Corp. 0.32%
Western Digital Corp. 0.31%
Ciena Corp. 0.30%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 0.29%
Centene Corp. 0.29%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

GRNY and RSP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFundstratInvesco
What it isFundstrat Granny Shots US Large CapS&P 500 equal weight
Total return, 1 year+13.8%+14.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−3.7 pts−2.7 pts
Expense ratio0.75%0.20%
Already in the S&P 50097.0%99.1%
Holdings40503

GRNY in plain words

GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.

RSP in plain words

RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 503 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GRNY or RSP?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GRNY returned +13.8% and RSP returned +14.8%, so RSP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GRNY or RSP?
GRNY charges 0.75% a year and RSP charges 0.20%, so RSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GRNY and RSP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of GRNY and 99% of RSP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GRNY against RSP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GRNY against RSP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GRNY-RSP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources