Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GRNY vs QQQ: how they differ

GRNY and QQQ hold 32% of their weight in the same names, and QQQ returned more over the year.

Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GRNY and QQQ hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GRNY and QQQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGRNYQQQ
Advanced Micro Devices Inc4.17%3.70%
Amazon.com Inc3.02%4.62%
Alphabet Inc2.96%3.52%
Broadcom Inc2.94%3.37%
NVIDIA Corp2.46%8.16%
Apple Inc2.40%7.29%
Microsoft Corp2.38%5.32%
Meta Platforms Inc2.24%2.97%
Tesla Inc2.15%3.46%
Costco Wholesale Corp2.33%1.86%
Netflix Inc2.82%1.59%
Palantir Technologies Inc2.33%1.58%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GRNYOnly in QQQ
Quanta Services Inc 3.20%Micron Technology, Inc. 4.80%
GE Vernova Inc 3.05%Alphabet Inc. 3.26%
Arista Networks Inc 2.88%Intel Corp. 2.52%
Caterpillar Inc 2.69%Walmart Inc. 2.48%
Bank of New York Mellon Corp/T 2.59%Cisco Systems, Inc. 2.09%
Eaton Corp PLC 2.56%Lam Research Corp. 1.75%
ONEOK Inc 2.49%Applied Materials, Inc. 1.57%
Air Products and Chemicals Inc 2.48%Texas Instruments Inc. 1.22%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

GRNY and QQQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFundstratInvesco
What it isFundstrat Granny Shots US Large CapNasdaq-100, book from QQQM
Total return, 1 year+13.8%+23.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−3.7 pts+5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.75%0.18%
Already in the S&P 50097.0%96.7%
Holdings40101

GRNY in plain words

GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.

QQQ in plain words

QQQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GRNY or QQQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GRNY returned +13.8% and QQQ returned +23.0%, so QQQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GRNY or QQQ?
GRNY charges 0.75% a year and QQQ charges 0.18%, so QQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GRNY and QQQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of GRNY and 97% of QQQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 32% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GRNY against QQQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GRNY against QQQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GRNY-QQQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources