Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GRNY vs IWD: how they differ

GRNY and IWD hold 16% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.

Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GRNY and IWD hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GRNY and IWD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGRNYIWD
Amazon.com Inc3.02%5.95%
Apple Inc2.40%5.38%
Microsoft Corp2.38%3.89%
JPMorgan Chase & Co2.33%2.46%
Chevron Corp2.46%0.86%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The2.27%0.82%
Costco Wholesale Corp2.33%0.66%
Meta Platforms Inc2.24%0.63%
Deere & Co2.30%0.44%
Union Pacific Corp2.39%0.42%
American Express Co2.17%0.36%
PNC Financial Services Group I2.21%0.28%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GRNYOnly in IWD
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.17%BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.62%
Quanta Services Inc 3.20%INTEL CORPORATION 1.72%
GE Vernova Inc 3.05%JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.72%
Alphabet Inc 2.96%EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%
Broadcom Inc 2.94%CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.30%
Arista Networks Inc 2.88%WALMART INC. 1.28%
Netflix Inc 2.82%ABBVIE INC. 1.15%
KLA Corp 2.75%UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED 1.05%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

GRNY and IWD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFundstratiShares
What it isFundstrat Granny Shots US Large CapRussell 1000 value
Total return, 1 year+13.8%+27.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−3.7 pts+9.9 pts
Expense ratio0.75%0.18%
Already in the S&P 50097.0%90.2%
Holdings40870

GRNY in plain words

GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.

IWD in plain words

IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GRNY or IWD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GRNY returned +13.8% and IWD returned +27.4%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GRNY or IWD?
GRNY charges 0.75% a year and IWD charges 0.18%, so IWD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GRNY and IWD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of GRNY and 90% of IWD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 16% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GRNY against IWD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GRNY against IWD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GRNY-IWD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources