Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GDX vs XLE: how they differ

Over the year XLE returned more, +50.7% against +40.2%, and XLE charges 0.08% against 0.51%.

VanEck Gold Miners ETF and State Street(R) Energy Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GDX and XLE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GDXOnly in XLE
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd 10.67%Exxon Mobil Corp 22.71%
Newmont Corp 10.42%Chevron Corp 16.12%
Barrick Mining Corp 7.95%ConocoPhillips 6.58%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 5.61%Williams Cos Inc/The 5.04%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc 5.04%Valero Energy Corp 4.65%
Franco-Nevada Corp 4.89%Marathon Petroleum Corp 4.49%
Kinross Gold Corp 4.40%EOG Resources Inc 4.15%
Gold Fields Ltd 4.07%SLB Ltd 4.10%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

GDX and XLE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
XLE
State Street(R) Energy Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsThematic ETFCore index fund
IssuerVanEckState Street
What it isMiners and metalsEnergy
Total return, 1 year+40.2%+50.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+22.7 pts+33.2 pts
Expense ratio0.51%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50011.0%100.0%
Holdings5921

GDX in plain words

By weight, 11% of GDX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 59 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +40.2% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 22.7 pts. It sits 16.2% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

XLE in plain words

XLE is an index equity fund tracking the Energy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +50.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 21 positions, with the top ten at 75.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GDX or XLE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GDX returned +40.2% and XLE returned +50.7%, so XLE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GDX or XLE?
GDX charges 0.51% a year and XLE charges 0.08%, so XLE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GDX and XLE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 11% of GDX and 100% of XLE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are GDX and XLE the same kind of fund?
No. GDX is a thematic ETF and XLE is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GDX against XLE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GDX against XLE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GDX-XLE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources