Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
GDX vs VBR: how they differ
Over the year GDX returned more, +40.2% against +16.3%, and VBR charges 0.05% against 0.51%.
VanEck Gold Miners ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GDX and VBR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in GDX | Only in VBR |
|---|---|
| Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd 10.67% | Jabil Inc 0.87% |
| Newmont Corp 10.42% | NRG Energy Inc 0.66% |
| Barrick Mining Corp 7.95% | Tapestry Inc 0.64% |
| Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 5.61% | Atmos Energy Corp 0.62% |
| Anglogold Ashanti Plc 5.04% | Williams-Sonoma Inc 0.59% |
| Franco-Nevada Corp 4.89% | Moderna Inc 0.54% |
| Kinross Gold Corp 4.40% | Smurfit Westrock PLC 0.52% |
| Gold Fields Ltd 4.07% | F5 Inc 0.50% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Thematic ETF | Core index fund |
| Issuer | VanEck | Vanguard |
| What it is | Miners and metals | Small-Cap Value |
| Total return, 1 year | +40.2% | +16.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +22.7 pts | −1.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.51% | 0.05% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 11.0% | 30.5% |
| Holdings | 59 | 840 |
GDX in plain words
By weight, 11% of GDX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 59 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +40.2% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 22.7 pts. It sits 16.2% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
VBR in plain words
VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GDX or VBR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GDX returned +40.2% and VBR returned +16.3%, so GDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, GDX or VBR?
- GDX charges 0.51% a year and VBR charges 0.05%, so VBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do GDX and VBR overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 11% of GDX and 30% of VBR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
- Are GDX and VBR the same kind of fund?
- No. GDX is a thematic ETF and VBR is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GDX against VBR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GDX-VBR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources