Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
GDX vs IEFA: how they differ
Over the year GDX returned more, +40.2% against +18.0%, and IEFA charges 0.07% against 0.51%.
VanEck Gold Miners ETF and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GDX and IEFA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in GDX | Only in IEFA |
|---|---|
| Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd 10.67% | ASML Holding N.V. 2.23% |
| Newmont Corp 10.42% | HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.25% |
| Barrick Mining Corp 7.95% | ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.17% |
| Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 5.61% | Novartis AG 1.11% |
| Anglogold Ashanti Plc 5.04% | Nestle S.A. 1.03% |
| Franco-Nevada Corp 4.89% | SHELL PLC 1.03% |
| Kinross Gold Corp 4.40% | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 0.90% |
| Gold Fields Ltd 4.07% | COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 0.84% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Thematic ETF | Core index fund |
| Issuer | VanEck | iShares |
| What it is | Miners and metals | Core MSCI EAFE |
| Total return, 1 year | +40.2% | +18.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +22.7 pts | +0.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.51% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 11.0% | 0.1% |
| Holdings | 59 | 2632 |
GDX in plain words
By weight, 11% of GDX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 59 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +40.2% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 22.7 pts. It sits 16.2% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
IEFA in plain words
IEFA is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2632 positions, with the top ten at 11.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GDX or IEFA?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GDX returned +40.2% and IEFA returned +18.0%, so GDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, GDX or IEFA?
- GDX charges 0.51% a year and IEFA charges 0.07%, so IEFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do GDX and IEFA overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 11% of GDX and 0% of IEFA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
- Are GDX and IEFA the same kind of fund?
- No. GDX is a thematic ETF and IEFA is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GDX against IEFA, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GDX-IEFA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources