Which returned more over the last year, FXI or VCLT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −13.8% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so VCLT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FXI or VCLT?

FXI charges 0.73% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FXI vs VCLT: how they differ

FXI and VCLT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VCLT returned more over the year.

iShares China Large-Cap ETF and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FXI and VCLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FXI	Only in VCLT
Alibaba Group Holding Limited 8.66%	Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch 0.38%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION 8.25%	CVS Health Corp 0.34%
Tencent Holdings Limited 7.72%	Meta Platforms Inc 0.29%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA 6.02%	Boeing Co/The 0.27%
XIAOMI CORPORATION 5.41%	Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd 0.27%
MEITUAN 4.79%	Amazon.com Inc 0.26%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of Chi 4.41%	Oracle Corp 0.24%
BYD COMPANY LIMITED 4.09%	AT&T Inc 0.24%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FXI and VCLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF	VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	China Large-Cap	Long-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	−13.8%	−4.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−31.3 pts	−22.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.73%	0.03%
Holdings	52	2775

FXI in plain words

FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 56.6%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

VCLT in plain words

VCLT is a bond fund tracking the Long-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 18.1% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXI or VCLT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −13.8% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so VCLT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FXI or VCLT?: FXI charges 0.73% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FXI against VCLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FXI against VCLT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FXI-VCLT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources