Which returned more over the last year, FXI or VBIL?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −13.8% and VBIL returned +3.8%, so VBIL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FXI or VBIL?

FXI charges 0.73% a year and VBIL charges 0.06%, so VBIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FXI vs VBIL: how they differ

FXI and VBIL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VBIL returned more over the year.

iShares China Large-Cap ETF and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FXI and VBIL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FXI	Only in VBIL
Alibaba Group Holding Limited 8.66%	United States Treasury Bill 6.78%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION 8.25%	United States Treasury Bill 6.10%
Tencent Holdings Limited 7.72%	United States Treasury Bill 5.61%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA 6.02%	United States Treasury Bill 5.41%
XIAOMI CORPORATION 5.41%	United States Treasury Bill 5.18%
MEITUAN 4.79%	United States Treasury Bill 5.17%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of Chi 4.41%	United States Treasury Bill 5.15%
BYD COMPANY LIMITED 4.09%	United States Treasury Bill 5.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

FXI and VBIL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF	VBIL Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	China Large-Cap	0-3 Month Treasury Bill
Total return, 1 year	−13.8%	+3.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−31.3 pts	−13.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.73%	0.06%
Holdings	52	26

FXI in plain words

FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 56.6%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

VBIL in plain words

VBIL is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 0-3 Month Treasury Bill. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXI or VBIL?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −13.8% and VBIL returned +3.8%, so VBIL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FXI or VBIL?: FXI charges 0.73% a year and VBIL charges 0.06%, so VBIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FXI against VBIL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FXI against VBIL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FXI-VBIL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources