Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FXI vs USO: how they differ
FXI is an equity index fund and USO a commodity fund, and over the year USO returned more, +112.2% against −13.8%.
iShares China Large-Cap ETF and United States Oil Fund, LP.
| FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | USO United States Oil Fund, LP | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | United |
| What it is | China Large-Cap | Oil |
| Total return, 1 year | −13.8% | +112.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −31.3 pts | +94.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.73% | not published |
| Holdings | 52 | not filed |
FXI in plain words
FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 56.6%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.
USO in plain words
USO is a commodity fund tracking the Oil. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +112.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 57.1% below its high of Apr 8, 2011 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FXI or USO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −13.8% and USO returned +112.2%, so USO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FXI against USO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FXI-USO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources