Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FXI vs MAGS: how they differ
FXI and MAGS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.
iShares China Large-Cap ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FXI and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FXI | Only in MAGS |
|---|---|
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 8.66% | TREASURY BILL 65.41% |
| CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION 8.25% | Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited 7.72% | NVIDIA Corp 4.15% |
| INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA 6.02% | Apple Inc 4.12% |
| XIAOMI CORPORATION 5.41% | Amazon.com Inc 4.11% |
| MEITUAN 4.79% | Tesla Inc 4.07% |
| Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of Chi 4.41% | Microsoft Corp 3.62% |
| BYD COMPANY LIMITED 4.09% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.59% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Roundhill |
| What it is | China Large-Cap | Magnificent Seven |
| Total return, 1 year | −13.8% | +14.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −31.3 pts | −3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.73% | 0.30% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 26.5% |
| Holdings | 52 | 9 |
FXI in plain words
FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 56.6%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FXI or MAGS?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −13.8% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FXI or MAGS?
- FXI charges 0.73% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so MAGS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FXI and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FXI and 26% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FXI against MAGS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FXI-MAGS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources