Which returned more over the last year, FXI or IUSB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −13.8% and IUSB returned −0.3%, so IUSB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FXI or IUSB?

FXI charges 0.73% a year and IUSB charges 0.06%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FXI vs IUSB: how they differ

FXI and IUSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IUSB returned more over the year.

iShares China Large-Cap ETF and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FXI and IUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FXI	Only in IUSB
Alibaba Group Holding Limited 8.66%	United States of America 0.38%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION 8.25%	United States of America 0.37%
Tencent Holdings Limited 7.72%	United States of America 0.37%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA 6.02%	United States of America 0.37%
XIAOMI CORPORATION 5.41%	United States of America 0.36%
MEITUAN 4.79%	United States of America 0.36%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of Chi 4.41%	United States of America 0.36%
BYD COMPANY LIMITED 4.09%	United States of America 0.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

FXI and IUSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF	IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	China Large-Cap	Core Universal USD Bond
Total return, 1 year	−13.8%	−0.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−31.3 pts	−17.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.73%	0.06%
Holdings	52	17819

FXI in plain words

FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 56.6%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

IUSB in plain words

IUSB is a bond fund tracking the Core Universal USD Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXI or IUSB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −13.8% and IUSB returned −0.3%, so IUSB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FXI or IUSB?: FXI charges 0.73% a year and IUSB charges 0.06%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FXI against IUSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FXI against IUSB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FXI-IUSB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources