Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FNDX vs XOVR: how they differ
FNDX and XOVR hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and XOVR hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FNDX | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| Alphabet Inc | 2.38% | 6.53% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 1.24% | 4.47% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 0.55% | 9.48% |
| Tesla Inc | 0.34% | 1.63% |
| Arista Networks Inc | 0.04% | 2.31% |
| ResMed Inc | 0.02% | 1.36% |
| Monolithic Power Systems Inc | 0.01% | 1.77% |
| Only in FNDX | Only in XOVR |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc 4.64% | Astera Labs Inc 7.75% |
| Intel Corp 2.57% | Applovin Corp 3.95% |
| Microsoft Corp 2.33% | Natera Inc 3.70% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29% | Robinhood Markets Inc 3.56% |
| Alphabet Inc 1.90% | Veeva Systems Inc 3.17% |
| Amazon.com Inc 1.86% | Reddit Inc 2.78% |
| Micron Technology Inc 1.60% | Affirm Holdings Inc 2.64% |
| Chevron Corp 1.49% | Axon Enterprise Inc 2.60% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | ERShares |
| What it is | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | Private-Public Crossover |
| Total return, 1 year | +26.1% | 0.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +8.6 pts | −17.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.75% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.2% | 43.4% |
| Holdings | 733 | 32 |
FNDX in plain words
FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
XOVR in plain words
XOVR is an index equity fund tracking the Private-Public Crossover. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned 0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 27, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or XOVR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or XOVR?
- FNDX charges 0.25% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so FNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FNDX and XOVR overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 43% of XOVR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against XOVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-XOVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources