Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs XLRE: how they differ

FNDX and XLRE hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and State Street(R) Real Estate Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and XLRE hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and XLRE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXXLRE
Prologis Inc0.12%8.72%
American Tower Corp0.10%5.26%
Weyerhaeuser Co0.08%1.80%
CBRE Group Inc0.08%4.11%
Crown Castle Inc0.08%3.44%
Equinix Inc0.08%7.10%
Welltower Inc0.08%11.07%
Digital Realty Trust Inc0.08%4.55%
Simon Property Group Inc0.08%5.01%
Ventas Inc0.05%4.50%
Public Storage0.05%4.51%
Equity Residential0.05%2.41%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in XLRE
Apple Inc 4.64%CoStar Group Inc 1.20%
Intel Corp 2.57%Federal Realty Investment Trust 1.01%
Alphabet Inc 2.38%
Microsoft Corp 2.33%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%
Alphabet Inc 1.90%
Amazon.com Inc 1.86%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FNDX and XLRE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
XLRE
State Street(R) Real Estate Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabState Street
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyReal estate
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+5.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts−11.9 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%100.0%
Holdings73331

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

XLRE in plain words

XLRE is an index equity fund tracking the Real estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 31 positions, with the top ten at 59.4%. It sat 5.6% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or XLRE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and XLRE returned +5.6%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or XLRE?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and XLRE charges 0.08%, so XLRE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and XLRE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 100% of XLRE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against XLRE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against XLRE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-XLRE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources