Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FNDX vs XLC: how they differ
FNDX and XLC hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and XLC hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FNDX | XLC |
|---|---|---|
| Alphabet Inc | 2.38% | 13.10% |
| Alphabet Inc | 1.90% | 10.44% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 1.24% | 19.93% |
| Verizon Communications Inc | 0.99% | 4.15% |
| AT&T Inc | 0.81% | 4.10% |
| Comcast Corp | 0.57% | 4.71% |
| Walt Disney Co/The | 0.35% | 4.49% |
| Warner Bros Discovery Inc | 0.32% | 4.67% |
| Netflix Inc | 0.24% | 4.84% |
| T-Mobile US Inc | 0.17% | 4.16% |
| Charter Communications Inc | 0.15% | 1.44% |
| Omnicom Group Inc | 0.09% | 2.51% |
| Only in FNDX | Only in XLC |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc 4.64% | Live Nation Entertainment Inc 3.50% |
| Intel Corp 2.57% | EchoStar Corp 1.67% |
| Microsoft Corp 2.33% | TKO Group Holdings Inc 1.53% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29% | Trade Desk Inc/The 0.93% |
| Amazon.com Inc 1.86% | Fox Corp 0.79% |
| Micron Technology Inc 1.60% | News Corp 0.41% |
| Chevron Corp 1.49% | |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.41% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | XLC State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | State Street |
| What it is | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | Communication services |
| Total return, 1 year | +26.1% | −2.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +8.6 pts | −19.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.2% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 733 | 23 |
FNDX in plain words
FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
XLC in plain words
XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 76.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or XLC?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and XLC returned −2.0%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or XLC?
- FNDX charges 0.25% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so XLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FNDX and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against XLC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-XLC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources