Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs VXF: how they differ

FNDX and VXF hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and VXF hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and VXF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXVXF
Ovintiv Inc0.13%0.17%
HF Sinclair Corp0.13%0.12%
Arrow Electronics Inc0.11%0.13%
Reliance Inc0.11%0.22%
TD SYNNEX Corp0.10%0.23%
Cheniere Energy Inc0.10%0.59%
Ferguson Enterprises Inc0.10%0.54%
Alcoa Corp0.09%0.16%
Ally Financial Inc0.09%0.15%
Avnet Inc0.10%0.09%
BorgWarner Inc0.09%0.16%
Lumen Technologies Inc0.22%0.09%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in VXF
Apple Inc 4.64%Space Exploration Technologies Corp 1.19%
Intel Corp 2.57%Snowflake Inc 1.03%
Alphabet Inc 2.38%Bloom Energy Corp 0.93%
Microsoft Corp 2.33%Cloudflare Inc 0.92%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%Astera Labs Inc 0.76%
Alphabet Inc 1.90%Rocket Lab Corp 0.61%
Amazon.com Inc 1.86%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.52%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc 0.47%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FNDX and VXF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyExtended Market
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+14.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts−3.4 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%0.0%
Holdings7333365

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

VXF in plain words

VXF is an index equity fund tracking the Extended Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3365 positions, with the top ten at 7.6%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or VXF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and VXF returned +14.1%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or VXF?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and VXF charges 0.05%, so VXF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and VXF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 0% of VXF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against VXF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against VXF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-VXF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources