Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs VUG: how they differ

FNDX and VUG hold 25% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and Vanguard Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and VUG hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and VUG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXVUG
Apple Inc4.64%11.67%
Alphabet Inc2.38%5.76%
Microsoft Corp2.33%7.62%
Alphabet Inc1.90%4.54%
Amazon.com Inc1.86%4.47%
Meta Platforms Inc1.24%3.41%
Intel Corp2.57%0.79%
Broadcom Inc0.65%4.29%
NVIDIA Corp0.55%12.63%
Costco Wholesale Corp0.53%1.16%
Applied Materials Inc0.47%1.60%
Lam Research Corp0.41%1.51%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in VUG
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%Palantir Technologies Inc 0.71%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.61%
Chevron Corp 1.49%Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 0.53%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.41%AppLovin Corp 0.41%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.38%Space Exploration Technologies Corp 0.29%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.37%Datadog Inc 0.26%
Walmart Inc 1.01%Snowflake Inc 0.25%
Verizon Communications Inc 0.99%Bloom Energy Corp 0.24%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FNDX and VUG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
VUG
Vanguard Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyUS growth
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+12.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts−4.6 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%97.4%
Holdings733147

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

VUG in plain words

VUG is an index equity fund tracking the US growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 60.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or VUG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and VUG returned +12.9%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or VUG?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and VUG charges 0.03%, so VUG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and VUG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 97% of VUG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 25% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against VUG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against VUG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-VUG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources