Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs VTI: how they differ

FNDX and VTI hold 61% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and VTI hold 61% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and VTI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXVTI
Apple Inc4.64%5.88%
Alphabet Inc2.38%2.90%
Microsoft Corp2.33%3.84%
Alphabet Inc1.90%2.29%
Amazon.com Inc1.86%3.19%
Micron Technology Inc1.60%1.80%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc1.41%1.25%
Meta Platforms Inc1.24%1.71%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.38%1.12%
Johnson & Johnson0.97%0.85%
Exxon Mobil Corp2.29%0.79%
Intel Corp2.57%0.78%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in VTI
Linde PLC 0.29%Palantir Technologies Inc 0.35%
Honeywell International Inc 0.29%Linde PLC 0.33%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.29%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.30%
Accenture PLC 0.26%Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 0.26%
Bunge Global SA 0.20%Eaton Corp PLC 0.23%
LyondellBasell Industries NV 0.19%AppLovin Corp 0.20%
Chubb Ltd 0.18%Chubb Ltd 0.17%
CRH PLC 0.17%Trane Technologies PLC 0.15%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FNDX and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyUS total market
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%88.3%
Holdings7333531

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

VTI in plain words

VTI is an index equity fund tracking the US total market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or VTI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and VTI returned +17.2%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or VTI?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 61% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against VTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against VTI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-VTI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources