Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs VT: how they differ

FNDX and VT hold 45% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and VT hold 45% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and VT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXVT
Apple Inc4.64%3.53%
Microsoft Corp2.33%2.73%
Alphabet Inc2.38%2.04%
Amazon.com Inc1.86%2.29%
Alphabet Inc1.90%1.61%
Meta Platforms Inc1.24%1.21%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.38%0.72%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc1.41%0.69%
Broadcom Inc0.65%1.74%
Exxon Mobil Corp2.29%0.59%
NVIDIA Corp0.55%4.22%
Micron Technology Inc1.60%0.52%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in VT
Linde PLC 0.29%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.29%Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 0.64%
Accenture PLC 0.26%ASML Holding NV 0.51%
Bunge Global SA 0.20%SK hynix Inc 0.44%
LyondellBasell Industries NV 0.19%Tencent Holdings Ltd 0.34%
Chubb Ltd 0.18%HSBC Holdings PLC 0.28%
CRH PLC 0.17%Palantir Technologies Inc 0.27%
Eaton Corp PLC 0.15%Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 0.27%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FNDX and VT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyTotal World Stock
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts+1.4 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%55.2%
Holdings73310042

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or VT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and VT returned +18.9%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or VT?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 45% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against VT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources