Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs VOOG: how they differ

FNDX and VOOG hold 34% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and VOOG hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and VOOG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXVOOG
Apple Inc4.64%6.38%
Alphabet Inc2.38%6.17%
Microsoft Corp2.33%9.31%
Alphabet Inc1.90%4.90%
Amazon.com Inc1.86%3.90%
Micron Technology Inc1.60%3.04%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc1.41%2.42%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.38%1.43%
Meta Platforms Inc1.24%3.85%
Johnson & Johnson0.97%0.89%
Cisco Systems Inc0.90%0.70%
Broadcom Inc0.65%5.90%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in VOOG
Intel Corp 2.57%Palantir Technologies Inc 1.00%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 0.51%
Chevron Corp 1.49%AppLovin Corp 0.46%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.37%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.34%
Walmart Inc 1.01%Datadog Inc 0.23%
Verizon Communications Inc 0.99%Robinhood Markets Inc 0.21%
CVS Health Corp 0.91%Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 0.20%
Bank of America Corp 0.87%Coherent Corp 0.19%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

FNDX and VOOG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyS&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+17.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts+0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%100.0%
Holdings733146

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

VOOG in plain words

VOOG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or VOOG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and VOOG returned +17.8%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or VOOG?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and VOOG charges 0.05%, so VOOG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and VOOG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 100% of VOOG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 34% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against VOOG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against VOOG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-VOOG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources