Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs VOE: how they differ

FNDX and VOE hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and VOE hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and VOE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXVOE
General Motors Co0.74%1.21%
Valero Energy Corp0.71%1.34%
Marathon Petroleum Corp0.63%1.29%
Ford Motor Co0.60%0.94%
Phillips 660.47%1.18%
FedEx Corp0.43%0.58%
Target Corp0.40%1.03%
Nucor Corp0.39%0.88%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co0.34%0.64%
Warner Bros Discovery Inc0.32%1.10%
Humana Inc0.32%0.83%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co0.29%1.04%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in VOE
Apple Inc 4.64%CRH PLC 1.24%
Intel Corp 2.57%TE Connectivity PLC 1.02%
Alphabet Inc 2.38%Johnson Controls International plc 0.77%
Microsoft Corp 2.33%United Airlines Holdings Inc 0.77%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%Aon PLC 0.58%
Alphabet Inc 1.90%Arch Capital Group Ltd 0.56%
Amazon.com Inc 1.86%Strategy Inc 0.50%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%Southwest Airlines Co 0.44%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FNDX and VOE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyMid-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+20.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts+2.7 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%96.6%
Holdings733170

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

VOE in plain words

VOE is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or VOE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and VOE returned +20.2%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or VOE?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and VOE charges 0.05%, so VOE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and VOE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 97% of VOE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 19% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against VOE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against VOE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-VOE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources