Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs VGT: how they differ

FNDX and VGT hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and VGT returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and VGT hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and VGT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXVGT
Apple Inc4.64%14.59%
Microsoft Corp2.33%9.47%
Intel Corp2.57%2.03%
Micron Technology Inc1.60%4.21%
Cisco Systems Inc0.90%1.85%
Broadcom Inc0.65%4.21%
NVIDIA Corp0.55%16.85%
QUALCOMM Inc0.53%1.09%
Applied Materials Inc0.47%1.40%
Texas Instruments Inc0.43%1.11%
Lam Research Corp0.41%1.56%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc0.39%3.21%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in VGT
Alphabet Inc 2.38%Palantir Technologies Inc 1.35%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.81%
Alphabet Inc 1.90%Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 0.75%
Amazon.com Inc 1.86%AppLovin Corp 0.58%
Chevron Corp 1.49%Accenture PLC 0.47%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.41%NXP Semiconductors NV 0.38%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.38%Datadog Inc 0.36%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.37%Snowflake Inc 0.36%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

FNDX and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyInformation technology
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+35.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts+17.9 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%86.9%
Holdings733317

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

VGT in plain words

VGT is an index equity fund tracking the Information technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 317 positions, with the top ten at 59.5%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or VGT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and VGT returned +35.4%, so VGT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or VGT?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and VGT charges 0.09%, so VGT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against VGT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against VGT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-VGT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources