Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs VDC: how they differ

FNDX and VDC hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and VDC hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and VDC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXVDC
Walmart Inc1.01%14.76%
Procter & Gamble Co/The0.66%9.27%
Costco Wholesale Corp0.53%12.04%
PepsiCo Inc0.41%4.30%
Target Corp0.40%2.03%
Philip Morris International Inc0.35%4.66%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co0.34%1.41%
Coca-Cola Co/The0.34%8.72%
Altria Group Inc0.29%3.91%
Kroger Co/The0.22%1.39%
Mondelez International Inc0.21%2.69%
Tyson Foods Inc0.17%0.71%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in VDC
Apple Inc 4.64%Bunge Global SA 0.73%
Intel Corp 2.57%Primo Brands Corp 0.41%
Alphabet Inc 2.38%Maplebear Inc 0.39%
Microsoft Corp 2.33%Vita Coco Co Inc/The 0.34%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%PriceSmart Inc 0.33%
Alphabet Inc 1.90%Celsius Holdings Inc 0.29%
Amazon.com Inc 1.86%Chefs' Warehouse Inc/The 0.27%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%Cal-Maine Foods Inc 0.25%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

FNDX and VDC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyConsumer Staples
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+4.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts−12.9 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%86.6%
Holdings733103

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

VDC in plain words

VDC is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer Staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 65.0%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or VDC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and VDC returned +4.6%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or VDC?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and VDC charges 0.09%, so VDC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and VDC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 87% of VDC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against VDC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against VDC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-VDC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources