Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or VCLT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FNDX or VCLT?

FNDX charges 0.25% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs VCLT: how they differ

FNDX and VCLT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and VCLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDX	Only in VCLT
Apple Inc 4.64%	Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch 0.38%
Intel Corp 2.57%	CVS Health Corp 0.34%
Alphabet Inc 2.38%	Meta Platforms Inc 0.29%
Microsoft Corp 2.33%	Boeing Co/The 0.27%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%	Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd 0.27%
Alphabet Inc 1.90%	Amazon.com Inc 0.26%
Amazon.com Inc 1.86%	Oracle Corp 0.24%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%	AT&T Inc 0.24%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

FNDX and VCLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF	VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Schwab	Vanguard
What it is	Fundamental U.S. Large Company	Long-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	+26.1%	−4.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+8.6 pts	−22.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.03%
Holdings	733	2775

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

VCLT in plain words

VCLT is a bond fund tracking the Long-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 18.1% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or VCLT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or VCLT?: FNDX charges 0.25% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against VCLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against VCLT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-VCLT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources