Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs VBR: how they differ

FNDX and VBR hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and VBR hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and VBR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXVBR
Centene Corp0.43%0.34%
Dow Inc0.30%0.21%
Steel Dynamics Inc0.19%0.34%
Viatris Inc0.15%0.40%
Moderna Inc0.15%0.54%
HF Sinclair Corp0.13%0.23%
Best Buy Co Inc0.13%0.33%
Ovintiv Inc0.13%0.32%
Charter Communications Inc0.15%0.12%
APA Corp0.12%0.25%
Arrow Electronics Inc0.11%0.23%
Reliance Inc0.11%0.41%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in VBR
Apple Inc 4.64%Smurfit Westrock PLC 0.52%
Intel Corp 2.57%DuPont de Nemours Inc 0.40%
Alphabet Inc 2.38%Bunge Global SA 0.36%
Microsoft Corp 2.33%API Group Corp 0.35%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%Fedex Freight Holding Co Inc 0.35%
Alphabet Inc 1.90%MKS Instruments Inc 0.32%
Amazon.com Inc 1.86%DT Midstream Inc 0.32%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%Flex Ltd 0.32%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FNDX and VBR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanySmall-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+16.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts−1.2 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%30.5%
Holdings733840

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

VBR in plain words

VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or VBR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and VBR returned +16.3%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or VBR?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and VBR charges 0.05%, so VBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and VBR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 30% of VBR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against VBR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against VBR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-VBR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources