Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FNDX vs VB: how they differ
FNDX and VB hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and VB hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FNDX | VB |
|---|---|---|
| Centene Corp | 0.43% | 0.19% |
| Steel Dynamics Inc | 0.19% | 0.19% |
| Viatris Inc | 0.15% | 0.23% |
| Moderna Inc | 0.15% | 0.30% |
| HF Sinclair Corp | 0.13% | 0.13% |
| Best Buy Co Inc | 0.13% | 0.18% |
| Ovintiv Inc | 0.13% | 0.18% |
| Dow Inc | 0.30% | 0.12% |
| APA Corp | 0.12% | 0.14% |
| Arrow Electronics Inc | 0.11% | 0.13% |
| Reliance Inc | 0.11% | 0.23% |
| TD SYNNEX Corp | 0.10% | 0.24% |
| Only in FNDX | Only in VB |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc 4.64% | Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55% |
| Intel Corp 2.57% | REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.38% | Astera Labs Inc 0.45% |
| Microsoft Corp 2.33% | Natera Inc 0.45% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29% | Twilio Inc 0.38% |
| Alphabet Inc 1.90% | MKS Instruments Inc 0.37% |
| Amazon.com Inc 1.86% | Flex Ltd 0.36% |
| Micron Technology Inc 1.60% | Carpenter Technology Corp 0.35% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | VB Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | Vanguard |
| What it is | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | Small-Cap |
| Total return, 1 year | +26.1% | +15.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +8.6 pts | −2.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.2% | 21.7% |
| Holdings | 733 | 1311 |
FNDX in plain words
FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
VB in plain words
VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or VB?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and VB returned +15.2%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or VB?
- FNDX charges 0.25% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FNDX and VB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 22% of VB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against VB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-VB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources