Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs URTH: how they differ

FNDX and URTH hold 51% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and URTH hold 51% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and URTH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXURTH
Apple Inc4.64%5.04%
Alphabet Inc2.38%2.43%
Microsoft Corp2.33%3.50%
Alphabet Inc1.90%2.01%
Amazon.com Inc1.86%2.86%
Meta Platforms Inc1.24%1.51%
Micron Technology Inc1.60%1.20%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.38%0.90%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc1.41%0.72%
Exxon Mobil Corp2.29%0.67%
Broadcom Inc0.65%2.21%
Johnson & Johnson0.97%0.60%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in URTH
Linde PLC 0.29%ASML Holding N.V. 0.69%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.29%PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 0.39%
Accenture PLC 0.26%HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.35%
Lumen Technologies Inc 0.22%ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.32%
Bunge Global SA 0.20%Novartis AG 0.31%
LyondellBasell Industries NV 0.19%ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.29%
Chubb Ltd 0.18%Nestle S.A. 0.29%
CRH PLC 0.17%SHELL PLC 0.26%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

FNDX and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabiShares
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyMSCI World
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.24%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%70.3%
Holdings7331322

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

URTH in plain words

URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1322 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or URTH?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and URTH returned +17.4%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or URTH?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so URTH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 51% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against URTH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against URTH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-URTH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources