Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FNDX vs SPYG: how they differ
FNDX and SPYG hold 35% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and SPYG hold 35% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FNDX | SPYG |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc | 4.64% | 5.99% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.38% | 5.91% |
| Microsoft Corp | 2.33% | 7.81% |
| Alphabet Inc | 1.90% | 4.71% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 1.86% | 3.48% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 1.60% | 3.67% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc | 1.41% | 2.58% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | 1.38% | 1.68% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 1.24% | 3.49% |
| Johnson & Johnson | 0.97% | 1.02% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 0.90% | 0.69% |
| Broadcom Inc | 0.65% | 5.04% |
| Only in FNDX | Only in SPYG |
|---|---|
| Intel Corp 2.57% | Palantir Technologies Inc 0.75% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29% | Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 0.55% |
| Chevron Corp 1.49% | AppLovin Corp 0.39% |
| UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.37% | Datadog Inc 0.24% |
| Walmart Inc 1.01% | Robinhood Markets Inc 0.22% |
| Verizon Communications Inc 0.99% | Coherent Corp 0.22% |
| CVS Health Corp 0.91% | DoorDash Inc 0.20% |
| Bank of America Corp 0.87% | Comfort Systems USA Inc 0.20% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | SPYG State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | State Street |
| What it is | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +26.1% | +17.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +8.6 pts | +0.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.2% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 733 | 147 |
FNDX in plain words
FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
SPYG in plain words
SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or SPYG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and SPYG returned +17.9%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or SPYG?
- FNDX charges 0.25% a year and SPYG charges 0.04%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FNDX and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 35% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against SPYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-SPYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources