Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs SCHG: how they differ

FNDX and SCHG hold 26% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and SCHG hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and SCHG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXSCHG
Apple Inc4.64%9.84%
Alphabet Inc2.38%4.76%
Microsoft Corp2.33%7.18%
Alphabet Inc1.90%3.78%
Amazon.com Inc1.86%5.68%
Meta Platforms Inc1.24%3.46%
UnitedHealth Group Inc1.37%1.20%
Broadcom Inc0.65%4.55%
NVIDIA Corp0.55%11.02%
Costco Wholesale Corp0.53%1.48%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc0.39%2.94%
Walt Disney Co/The0.35%0.63%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in SCHG
Intel Corp 2.57%Palantir Technologies Inc 1.25%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 0.64%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%AppLovin Corp 0.58%
Chevron Corp 1.49%Snowflake Inc 0.31%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.41%Datadog Inc 0.28%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.38%Cloudflare Inc 0.27%
Walmart Inc 1.01%Robinhood Markets Inc 0.26%
Verizon Communications Inc 0.99%Coherent Corp 0.24%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

FNDX and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabSchwab
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyU.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+12.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts−4.8 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%95.4%
Holdings733193

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or SCHG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or SCHG?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 26% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against SCHG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources