Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs SCHD: how they differ

FNDX and SCHD hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and SCHD returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and SCHD hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and SCHD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXSCHD
Chevron Corp1.49%3.84%
UnitedHealth Group Inc1.37%5.10%
Verizon Communications Inc0.99%3.66%
Merck & Co Inc0.68%3.87%
ConocoPhillips0.66%3.52%
Procter & Gamble Co/The0.66%3.55%
Ford Motor Co0.60%1.72%
Comcast Corp0.57%2.25%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co0.53%2.94%
QUALCOMM Inc0.53%6.75%
Home Depot Inc/The0.52%3.37%
Texas Instruments Inc0.43%5.92%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in SCHD
Apple Inc 4.64%Autoliv Inc 0.22%
Intel Corp 2.57%Columbia Banking System Inc 0.22%
Alphabet Inc 2.38%Erie Indemnity Co 0.14%
Microsoft Corp 2.33%Bank OZK 0.13%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%Moelis & Co 0.13%
Alphabet Inc 1.90%Federated Hermes Inc 0.10%
Amazon.com Inc 1.86%Korn Ferry 0.09%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc 0.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

FNDX and SCHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabSchwab
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyUS dividend
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+27.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts+10.1 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%95.1%
Holdings73399

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

SCHD in plain words

SCHD is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or SCHD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and SCHD returned +27.6%, so SCHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or SCHD?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and SCHD charges 0.06%, so SCHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and SCHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 95% of SCHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 15% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against SCHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against SCHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-SCHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources