Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FNDX vs NOBL: how they differ
FNDX and NOBL hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and NOBL hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FNDX | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| Chevron Corp | 1.49% | 1.44% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp | 2.29% | 1.44% |
| Walmart Inc | 1.01% | 1.31% |
| Johnson & Johnson | 0.97% | 1.47% |
| Procter & Gamble Co/The | 0.66% | 1.48% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 0.60% | 1.61% |
| AbbVie Inc | 0.53% | 1.56% |
| PepsiCo Inc | 0.41% | 1.37% |
| Target Corp | 0.40% | 1.41% |
| Nucor Corp | 0.39% | 1.77% |
| International Business Machines Corp | 0.38% | 1.71% |
| Archer-Daniels-Midland Co | 0.34% | 1.68% |
| Only in FNDX | Only in NOBL |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc 4.64% | Federal Realty Investment Trust 1.58% |
| Intel Corp 2.57% | FactSet Research Systems, Inc. 1.50% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.38% | Linde plc 1.48% |
| Microsoft Corp 2.33% | Chubb Ltd. 1.39% |
| Alphabet Inc 1.90% | Amcor plc 1.39% |
| Amazon.com Inc 1.86% | Medtronic plc 1.32% |
| Micron Technology Inc 1.60% | Erie Indemnity Co. 1.23% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.41% | Pentair plc 1.16% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | ProShares |
| What it is | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats |
| Total return, 1 year | +26.1% | +9.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +8.6 pts | −8.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.2% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 733 | 69 |
FNDX in plain words
FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
NOBL in plain words
NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or NOBL?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and NOBL returned +9.4%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or NOBL?
- FNDX charges 0.25% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so FNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FNDX and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 100% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against NOBL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-NOBL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources