Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or MUB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and MUB returned +0.1%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FNDX or MUB?

FNDX charges 0.25% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs MUB: how they differ

FNDX and MUB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and iShares National Muni Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and MUB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDX	Only in MUB
Apple Inc 4.64%	Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%
Intel Corp 2.57%	New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%
Alphabet Inc 2.38%	New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%
Microsoft Corp 2.33%	Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%	Northwest Independent School District 0.13%
Alphabet Inc 1.90%	Ohio State University (The) 0.13%
Amazon.com Inc 1.86%	State of New Jersey 0.13%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%	State of California 0.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

FNDX and MUB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Schwab	iShares
What it is	Fundamental U.S. Large Company	National Muni Bond
Total return, 1 year	+26.1%	+0.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+8.6 pts	−17.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.05%
Holdings	733	6603

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or MUB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and MUB returned +0.1%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or MUB?: FNDX charges 0.25% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against MUB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against MUB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-MUB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources