Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs IYE: how they differ

FNDX and IYE hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and IYE returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and iShares U.S. Energy ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and IYE hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and IYE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXIYE
Exxon Mobil Corp2.29%21.74%
Chevron Corp1.49%15.41%
Valero Energy Corp0.71%3.54%
ConocoPhillips0.66%6.51%
Marathon Petroleum Corp0.63%3.44%
Phillips 660.47%3.32%
EOG Resources Inc0.30%3.56%
Devon Energy Corp0.26%1.39%
SLB Ltd0.24%3.95%
Occidental Petroleum Corp0.21%1.91%
Kinder Morgan Inc0.16%2.92%
Baker Hughes a GE Co LLC0.15%3.13%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in IYE
Apple Inc 4.64%TECHNIPFMC PLC 1.35%
Intel Corp 2.57%COTERRA ENERGY INC. 1.21%
Alphabet Inc 2.38%TEXAS PACIFIC LAND CORPORATION 1.14%
Microsoft Corp 2.33%DT MIDSTREAM, INC. 0.67%
Alphabet Inc 1.90%VIPER ENERGY, INC. 0.41%
Amazon.com Inc 1.86%WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC LIMITED 0.35%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%ANTERO MIDSTREAM CORPORATION 0.33%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.41%ENPHASE ENERGY, INC. 0.19%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FNDX and IYE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
IYE
iShares U.S. Energy ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabiShares
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyU.S. Energy
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+48.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts+31.3 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.37%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%89.0%
Holdings73338

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

IYE in plain words

IYE is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Energy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +48.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 89% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 38 positions, with the top ten at 69.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or IYE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and IYE returned +48.8%, so IYE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or IYE?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and IYE charges 0.37%, so FNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and IYE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 89% of IYE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against IYE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against IYE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-IYE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources