Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FNDX vs IWF: how they differ
FNDX and IWF hold 29% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and IWF hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FNDX | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc | 4.64% | 6.72% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.38% | 6.18% |
| Microsoft Corp | 2.33% | 4.11% |
| Alphabet Inc | 1.90% | 4.98% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 1.60% | 3.86% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 1.24% | 3.01% |
| Broadcom Inc | 0.65% | 5.21% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 0.60% | 1.44% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 1.86% | 0.57% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 0.55% | 13.85% |
| Costco Wholesale Corp | 0.53% | 0.54% |
| Home Depot Inc/The | 0.52% | 0.77% |
| Only in FNDX | Only in IWF |
|---|---|
| Intel Corp 2.57% | PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 0.77% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29% | CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS, INC. 0.57% |
| Chevron Corp 1.49% | APPLOVIN CORPORATION 0.37% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.41% | TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPAN 0.32% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.38% | DATADOG, INC. 0.25% |
| UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.37% | SNOWFLAKE INC. 0.25% |
| Verizon Communications Inc 0.99% | SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. 0.24% |
| Johnson & Johnson 0.97% | BLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION 0.24% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | iShares |
| What it is | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | Russell 1000 growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +26.1% | +7.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +8.6 pts | −10.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.2% | 93.6% |
| Holdings | 733 | 368 |
FNDX in plain words
FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
IWF in plain words
IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 368 positions, with the top ten at 54.4%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or IWF?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and IWF returned +7.0%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or IWF?
- FNDX charges 0.25% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so IWF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FNDX and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 29% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against IWF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-IWF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources