Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs IJT: how they differ

FNDX and IJT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and IJT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and IJT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXIJT
Lumen Technologies Inc0.22%0.36%
Qorvo Inc0.05%0.52%
Dana Inc0.03%0.16%
StoneX Group Inc0.03%0.93%
Helmerich & Payne Inc0.03%0.18%
WillScot Holdings Corp0.02%0.30%
Resideo Technologies Inc0.02%0.27%
American Eagle Outfitters Inc0.02%0.12%
ADT Inc0.02%0.13%
Hertz Global Holdings Inc0.02%0.02%
Ralliant Corp0.00%0.47%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in IJT
Apple Inc 4.64%FormFactor, Inc. 1.38%
Intel Corp 2.57%Viasat, Inc. 1.35%
Alphabet Inc 2.38%Argan, Inc. 1.24%
Microsoft Corp 2.33%BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 1.22%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%Krystal Biotech, Inc. 1.08%
Alphabet Inc 1.90%ESCO Technologies, Inc. 1.00%
Amazon.com Inc 1.86%Alkermes plc 0.97%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%Everus Construction Group, Inc. 0.94%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FNDX and IJT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
IJT
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabiShares
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyS&P Small-Cap 600 Growth
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.18%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%0.0%
Holdings733347

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

IJT in plain words

IJT is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 347 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or IJT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and IJT returned +17.6%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or IJT?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and IJT charges 0.18%, so IJT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and IJT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 0% of IJT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against IJT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against IJT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-IJT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources