Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs IJH: how they differ

FNDX and IJH hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and IJH hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and IJH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXIJH
HF Sinclair Corp0.13%0.29%
Ovintiv Inc0.13%0.40%
Arrow Electronics Inc0.11%0.30%
Reliance Inc0.11%0.53%
TD SYNNEX Corp0.10%0.55%
PBF Energy Inc0.10%0.11%
Avnet Inc0.10%0.20%
Alcoa Corp0.09%0.38%
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc0.09%0.15%
Ally Financial Inc0.09%0.35%
BorgWarner Inc0.09%0.38%
Macy's Inc0.09%0.17%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in IJH
Apple Inc 4.64%TWILIO INC 0.86%
Intel Corp 2.57%CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.85%
Alphabet Inc 2.38%MKS INC 0.83%
Microsoft Corp 2.33%CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%ENTEGRIS INC 0.76%
Alphabet Inc 1.90%NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%
Amazon.com Inc 1.86%ATI INC 0.74%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FNDX and IJH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabiShares
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyS&P MidCap 400
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+13.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts−4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%0.0%
Holdings733400

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

IJH in plain words

IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or IJH?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and IJH returned +13.4%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or IJH?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and IJH charges 0.05%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and IJH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 0% of IJH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against IJH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against IJH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-IJH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources