Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs GRNY: how they differ

FNDX and GRNY hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and GRNY hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and GRNY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXGRNY
Apple Inc4.64%2.40%
Alphabet Inc2.38%2.96%
Microsoft Corp2.33%2.38%
Amazon.com Inc1.86%3.02%
Chevron Corp1.49%2.46%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.38%2.33%
Meta Platforms Inc1.24%2.24%
Broadcom Inc0.65%2.94%
Caterpillar Inc0.60%2.69%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The0.58%2.27%
NVIDIA Corp0.55%2.46%
Costco Wholesale Corp0.53%2.33%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in GRNY
Intel Corp 2.57%Strategy Inc 3.01%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%Eaton Corp PLC 2.56%
Alphabet Inc 1.90%Texas Pacific Land Corp 2.40%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%Palantir Technologies Inc 2.33%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.41%Robinhood Markets Inc 2.24%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.37%
Walmart Inc 1.01%
Verizon Communications Inc 0.99%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FNDX and GRNY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabFundstrat
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyFundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts−3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.75%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%97.0%
Holdings73340

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

GRNY in plain words

GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or GRNY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and GRNY returned +13.8%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or GRNY?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and GRNY charges 0.75%, so FNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and GRNY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 97% of GRNY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against GRNY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against GRNY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-GRNY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources