Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FDVV vs XLK: how they differ
FDVV and XLK hold 24% of their weight in the same names, and XLK returned more over the year.
Fidelity High Dividend ETF and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and XLK hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FDVV | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 6.86% | 14.66% |
| APPLE INC | 5.70% | 12.86% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 4.50% | 8.38% |
| BROADCOM INC | 3.50% | 5.41% |
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC. | 1.32% | 1.51% |
| IBM CORPORATION | 0.90% | 1.47% |
| DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC | 1.44% | 0.70% |
| HP INC | 0.86% | 0.11% |
| SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS INC | 0.96% | 0.06% |
| Only in FDVV | Only in XLK |
|---|---|
| JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58% | Micron Technology Inc 5.42% |
| ALPHABET INC 2.21% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.28% |
| COCA COLA CO 1.85% | Intel Corp 3.68% |
| PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81% | Applied Materials Inc 3.20% |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.78% | Lam Research Corp 3.02% |
| GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE) 1.71% | Cisco Systems Inc 2.59% |
| ALTRIA GROUP INC 1.70% | KLA Corp 2.20% |
| HOME DEPOT INC 1.66% | Sandisk Corp 1.88% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | XLK State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | State Street |
| What it is | High Dividend | Technology |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +39.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.3 pts | +21.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.7% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 96 | 74 |
FDVV in plain words
FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.
XLK in plain words
XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or XLK?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and XLK returned +39.2%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FDVV or XLK?
- FDVV charges 0.15% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FDVV and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 24% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against XLK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-XLK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources