Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FDVV vs XLI: how they differ
FDVV and XLI hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.
Fidelity High Dividend ETF and State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and XLI hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FDVV | XLI |
|---|---|---|
| CATERPILLAR INC | 0.46% | 8.52% |
| GE AEROSPACE | 0.34% | 6.77% |
| RTX CORP | 0.29% | 4.44% |
| UNION PACIFIC CORP | 0.28% | 2.81% |
| LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP | 0.22% | 1.79% |
| UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC | 0.22% | 1.39% |
| AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC | 0.21% | 1.55% |
| PACCAR INC | 0.20% | 1.10% |
| PAYCHEX INC | 0.19% | 0.55% |
| Only in FDVV | Only in XLI |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 6.86% | GE Vernova Inc 5.48% |
| APPLE INC 5.70% | Boeing Co/The 2.96% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 4.50% | Eaton Corp PLC 2.87% |
| BROADCOM INC 3.50% | Deere & Co 2.77% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58% | Uber Technologies Inc 2.55% |
| ALPHABET INC 2.21% | Vertiv Holdings Co 2.23% |
| COCA COLA CO 1.85% | Parker-Hannifin Corp 2.14% |
| PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81% | Trane Technologies PLC 1.89% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | XLI State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | State Street |
| What it is | High Dividend | Industrials |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +14.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.3 pts | −3.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.7% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 96 | 81 |
FDVV in plain words
FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.
XLI in plain words
XLI is an index equity fund tracking the Industrials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 41.4%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or XLI?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and XLI returned +14.3%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FDVV or XLI?
- FDVV charges 0.15% a year and XLI charges 0.08%, so XLI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FDVV and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against XLI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-XLI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources