Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FDVV vs XLG: how they differ

FDVV and XLG hold 37% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and XLG hold 37% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FDVV and XLG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFDVVXLG
NVIDIA CORP6.86%13.10%
APPLE INC5.70%10.76%
MICROSOFT CORP4.50%8.18%
BROADCOM INC3.50%4.85%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO2.58%2.28%
ALPHABET INC2.21%6.05%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION1.78%0.96%
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO1.81%0.92%
HOME DEPOT INC1.66%0.88%
COCA COLA CO1.85%0.82%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE)1.71%0.75%
META PLATFORMS INC0.74%3.61%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FDVVOnly in XLG
ALTRIA GROUP INC 1.70%Amazon.com, Inc. 6.99%
STARBUCKS CORP 1.66%Alphabet Inc. 4.82%
TJX COMPANIES INC 1.65%Tesla, Inc. 2.90%
DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.44%Berkshire Hathaway Inc. 2.35%
NEXTERA ENERGY INC 1.39%Exxon Mobil Corp. 1.74%
LOWES COS INC 1.38%Walmart Inc. 1.56%
ORKLA ASA 1.37%Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 1.56%
US BANCORP DEL 1.34%Visa Inc. 1.50%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

FDVV and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityInvesco
What it isHigh DividendS&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+12.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts−5.3 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.20%
Already in the S&P 50086.7%100.0%
Holdings9651

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

XLG in plain words

XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or XLG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and XLG returned +12.2%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or XLG?
FDVV charges 0.15% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FDVV and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 100% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 37% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDVV against XLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against XLG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-XLG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources