Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FDVV vs VOX: how they differ

FDVV and VOX hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF and Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and VOX hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FDVV and VOX both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFDVVVOX
ALPHABET INC2.21%16.14%
META PLATFORMS INC0.74%21.12%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC0.14%4.17%
AT and T INC0.13%3.69%
WALT DISNEY CO/THE0.13%3.96%
COMCAST CORP0.08%2.36%
T-MOBILE US INC0.08%2.50%
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC0.05%2.00%
OMNICOM GROUP INC0.04%1.38%
NEW YORK TIMES CO0.04%0.70%
MATCH GROUP INC0.04%0.49%
FOX CORPORATION0.04%0.60%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FDVVOnly in VOX
NVIDIA CORP 6.86%Alphabet Inc 10.61%
APPLE INC 5.70%Netflix Inc 4.77%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.50%Warner Bros Discovery Inc 2.74%
BROADCOM INC 3.50%Take-Two Interactive Software Inc 2.09%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58%Live Nation Entertainment Inc 1.65%
COCA COLA CO 1.85%AST SpaceMobile Inc 1.42%
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81%ROBLOX Corp 1.37%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.78%Liberty Media Corp-Liberty Formula One 1.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FDVV and VOX on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
VOX
Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityVanguard
What it isHigh DividendCommunication Services
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+2.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts−14.6 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50086.7%84.5%
Holdings96114

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

VOX in plain words

VOX is an index equity fund tracking the Communication Services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 114 positions, with the top ten at 72.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or VOX?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and VOX returned +2.9%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or VOX?
FDVV charges 0.15% a year and VOX charges 0.09%, so VOX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FDVV and VOX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 84% of VOX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDVV against VOX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against VOX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-VOX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources