Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FDVV vs VOOG: how they differ

FDVV and VOOG hold 30% of their weight in the same names, and VOOG returned more over the year.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and VOOG hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FDVV and VOOG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFDVVVOOG
NVIDIA CORP6.86%14.29%
APPLE INC5.70%6.38%
MICROSOFT CORP4.50%9.31%
BROADCOM INC3.50%5.90%
ALPHABET INC2.21%6.17%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO2.58%1.43%
META PLATFORMS INC0.74%3.85%
ELI LILLY and CO0.56%2.44%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE)1.71%0.53%
JOHNSON and JOHNSON0.49%0.89%
CATERPILLAR INC0.46%1.14%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC1.64%0.43%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FDVVOnly in VOOG
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81%Alphabet Inc 4.90%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.78%Amazon.com Inc 3.90%
ALTRIA GROUP INC 1.70%Micron Technology Inc 3.04%
HOME DEPOT INC 1.66%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.42%
STARBUCKS CORP 1.66%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.34%
PEPSICO INC 1.63%Tesla Inc 2.12%
WELLS FARGO and CO 1.52%Lam Research Corp 1.11%
DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.44%Netflix Inc 1.01%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FDVV and VOOG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityVanguard
What it isHigh DividendS&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+17.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts+0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50086.7%100.0%
Holdings96146

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

VOOG in plain words

VOOG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or VOOG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and VOOG returned +17.8%, so VOOG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or VOOG?
FDVV charges 0.15% a year and VOOG charges 0.05%, so VOOG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FDVV and VOOG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 100% of VOOG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 30% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDVV against VOOG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against VOOG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-VOOG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources