Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FDVV vs VONG: how they differ
FDVV and VONG hold 28% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.
Fidelity High Dividend ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and VONG hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FDVV | VONG |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 6.86% | 13.09% |
| APPLE INC | 5.70% | 11.97% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 4.50% | 8.98% |
| BROADCOM INC | 3.50% | 5.78% |
| ALPHABET INC | 2.21% | 3.91% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 0.74% | 3.20% |
| HOME DEPOT INC | 1.66% | 0.73% |
| ELI LILLY and CO | 0.56% | 2.67% |
| COCA COLA CO | 1.85% | 0.45% |
| ABBVIE INC | 0.40% | 1.16% |
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC. | 1.32% | 0.34% |
| GE AEROSPACE | 0.34% | 1.02% |
| Only in FDVV | Only in VONG |
|---|---|
| JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58% | Amazon.com Inc 5.07% |
| PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81% | Tesla Inc 3.48% |
| ALTRIA GROUP INC 1.70% | Alphabet Inc 3.15% |
| PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 1.64% | Visa Inc 1.57% |
| WELLS FARGO and CO 1.52% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.47% |
| NEXTERA ENERGY INC 1.39% | Costco Wholesale Corp 1.28% |
| LOWES COS INC 1.38% | Lam Research Corp 1.21% |
| ORKLA ASA 1.37% | Mastercard Inc 1.20% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Vanguard |
| What it is | High Dividend | Russell 1000 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +7.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.3 pts | −10.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.7% | 95.6% |
| Holdings | 96 | 387 |
FDVV in plain words
FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.
VONG in plain words
VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or VONG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and VONG returned +7.2%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FDVV or VONG?
- FDVV charges 0.15% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FDVV and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 28% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources