Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FDVV vs VGT: how they differ

FDVV and VGT hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and VGT returned more over the year.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and VGT hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FDVV and VGT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFDVVVGT
NVIDIA CORP6.86%16.85%
APPLE INC5.70%14.59%
MICROSOFT CORP4.50%9.47%
BROADCOM INC3.50%4.21%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC.1.32%1.11%
IBM CORPORATION0.90%1.08%
DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC1.44%0.61%
HP INC0.86%0.15%
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS INC0.96%0.10%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FDVVOnly in VGT
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58%Micron Technology Inc 4.21%
ALPHABET INC 2.21%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.21%
COCA COLA CO 1.85%Intel Corp 2.03%
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81%Cisco Systems Inc 1.85%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.78%Lam Research Corp 1.56%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE) 1.71%Oracle Corp 1.46%
ALTRIA GROUP INC 1.70%Applied Materials Inc 1.40%
HOME DEPOT INC 1.66%Palantir Technologies Inc 1.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FDVV and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityVanguard
What it isHigh DividendInformation technology
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+35.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts+17.9 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50086.7%86.9%
Holdings96317

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

VGT in plain words

VGT is an index equity fund tracking the Information technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 317 positions, with the top ten at 59.5%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or VGT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and VGT returned +35.4%, so VGT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or VGT?
FDVV charges 0.15% a year and VGT charges 0.09%, so VGT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FDVV and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDVV against VGT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against VGT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-VGT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources