Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or VGIT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and VGIT returned −1.2%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FDVV or VGIT?

FDVV charges 0.15% a year and VGIT charges 0.03%, so VGIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FDVV vs VGIT: how they differ

FDVV and VGIT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and VGIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FDVV	Only in VGIT
NVIDIA CORP 6.86%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.97%
APPLE INC 5.70%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.94%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.50%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.92%
BROADCOM INC 3.50%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.92%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.92%
ALPHABET INC 2.21%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.89%
COCA COLA CO 1.85%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.89%
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.87%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FDVV and VGIT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Fidelity	Vanguard
What it is	High Dividend	Intermediate-Term Treasury
Total return, 1 year	+17.2%	−1.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.3 pts	−18.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.03%
Holdings	96	103

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

VGIT in plain words

VGIT is a bond fund tracking the Intermediate-Term Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −1.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or VGIT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and VGIT returned −1.2%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or VGIT?: FDVV charges 0.15% a year and VGIT charges 0.03%, so VGIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDVV against VGIT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against VGIT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-VGIT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources