Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FDVV vs VEA: how they differ
FDVV and VEA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VEA returned more over the year.
Fidelity High Dividend ETF and Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and VEA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FDVV | Only in VEA |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 6.86% | ASML Holding NV 2.37% |
| APPLE INC 5.70% | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 1.56% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 4.50% | SK hynix Inc 1.40% |
| BROADCOM INC 3.50% | HSBC Holdings PLC 1.01% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58% | Novartis AG 0.91% |
| ALPHABET INC 2.21% | Royal Bank of Canada 0.90% |
| COCA COLA CO 1.85% | AstraZeneca PLC 0.87% |
| PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81% | Nestle SA 0.82% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | VEA Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Vanguard |
| What it is | High Dividend | Developed markets ex US |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +24.5% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.3 pts | +7.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.7% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 96 | 3870 |
FDVV in plain words
FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.
VEA in plain words
VEA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3870 positions, with the top ten at 13.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or VEA?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and VEA returned +24.5%, so VEA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FDVV or VEA?
- FDVV charges 0.15% a year and VEA charges 0.03%, so VEA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FDVV and VEA overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 0% of VEA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against VEA, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-VEA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources