Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FDVV vs SPYG: how they differ

FDVV and SPYG hold 30% of their weight in the same names, and SPYG returned more over the year.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and SPYG hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FDVV and SPYG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFDVVSPYG
NVIDIA CORP6.86%13.66%
APPLE INC5.70%5.99%
MICROSOFT CORP4.50%7.81%
BROADCOM INC3.50%5.04%
ALPHABET INC2.21%5.91%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO2.58%1.68%
META PLATFORMS INC0.74%3.49%
ELI LILLY and CO0.56%2.67%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE)1.71%0.55%
JOHNSON and JOHNSON0.49%1.02%
CATERPILLAR INC0.46%1.38%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC1.64%0.45%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FDVVOnly in SPYG
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81%Alphabet Inc 4.71%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.78%Micron Technology Inc 3.67%
ALTRIA GROUP INC 1.70%Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
HOME DEPOT INC 1.66%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.67%
STARBUCKS CORP 1.66%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.58%
PEPSICO INC 1.63%Tesla Inc 2.07%
WELLS FARGO and CO 1.52%Applied Materials Inc 1.62%
DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.44%Lam Research Corp 1.53%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

FDVV and SPYG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
SPYG
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityState Street
What it isHigh DividendSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+17.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts+0.4 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50086.7%100.0%
Holdings96147

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

SPYG in plain words

SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or SPYG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and SPYG returned +17.9%, so SPYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or SPYG?
FDVV charges 0.15% a year and SPYG charges 0.04%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FDVV and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 30% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDVV against SPYG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against SPYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-SPYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources